GEOSCIENCE FOR SOCIETY, EDUCATION AND ENVIRONMET

CONTENT 

Foreword 

Chapter 1  GEOSCIENCE FOR SOCIETY 

1.1. URBAN AND DISASTER LEGISLATION: EXAMPLES FROM TURKEY AND ALL OVER THE WORLD – Ayşe Çağlayan1,2, Haci Abdullah Uçan1, Veysel Işik2, Reza Saber2

1 Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, General Directorate of Spatial Planning, Department of Geological Survey, Ankara, Turkey, 2 Ankara University, Department of Geological Engineering, Tectonics Research Group, Ankara, Turkey

1.2. EXAMPLE OF THE BIGGEST FLOOD DISASTER IN IRANIAN HISTORY: GOLESTAN PROVINCE (NE IRAN)Marjan Tourani1, Ayşe Çağlayan1,2, Reza Saber1, Veysel Işik1

1Ankara University, Department of Geological Engineering, Tectonics Research Group, Ankara, Turkey, 2Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, General Directorate of Spatial Planning, Department of Geological Survey, Ankara, Turkey

1.3. ROMANIA CONTINUES THE PARTNERSHIP IN THE NEW STAGE OF EPOS-ERIC PROJECT (SUSTAINABILITY PHASE) – Constantin Ionescu1, Andreea Craiu1, Mihaela Drăgan1, Alexandru Mărmureanu1, Alexandra Muntean1, Eduard Năstase1

1National Institute for Research and Development for Earth Physics, Romania

1.4. APPLICATION OF EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM FOR GAS DISTRIBUTION PROTECTION – Victorin-Emilian Toader1, Constantin Ionescu1, Alexandru Marmureanu1, Andrei Mihai1, Iosif Lingvay2, Ovidiu Ciogescu2

1 National Institute for Research and Development for Earth Physics, Romania, 2 Electrovâlcea SRL, Romania

1.5. USE OF PASSIVE SEISMIC TO PREVENT ERRORS RELATED TO INCORRECT ESTIMATION OF HYDROCARBON RESERVES – Gleb Kashin1, Vadim Mironychev1, Olga Likhacheva1

1 M.S. Gutseriev Institute of Oil and Gas Udmurt State University, Russia

1.6. GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE OUTCROPS, LANDSLIDE AFFECTED AREAS AND SOME OTHER EROSION FORMS IN PUCIOASA TOWN AND ITS SURROUNDINGS AS A BASIS FOR GEOTOURISM DEVELOPMENTFlorina Chitea 1,2,3, Maria-Lidia Nuțu-Dragomir 2,3, Lucica Niculae 2,3

1 Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, University of Bucharest, Romania, 2 Institute of Geodynamics of Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania,3 Romanian Society of Applied Geophysics, Bucharest, Romania

1.7. MAGNETIC EXPLORATION APPROACH TO RESEARCH AND RECONSTRUCT THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SETTLEMENT OF URLAȚI, PRAHOVA COUNTYAlin Frînculeasa1, Cornel David2, Alexandru Popa3, Mădălina Frînculeasa4

1 Prahova District Museum of History and Archaeology, Archaeology Department, Ploieşti, Romania, 2 Geomathics One, Bucharest, Romania, 3 National Museum of Eastern Carpathians, Sf. Gheorghe, Romania, 4 University Valahia of Târgoviște, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Geography, Târgoviște, Romania

1.8. COMPRESSED RARITIES: GEO-, PALEO- AND MORPHOLOGICAL PARTICULARITIES WITHIN THE SPELEAN ENVIRONMENTMaria-Lidia Nuțu-Dragomir1,2,4, Gigi-Paul Dragomir1, Ștefan Ungureanu1,3

1Speleological Association “Focul Viu”, Bucharest, Romania, 2 “Sabba Ştefănescu” Institute of Geodynamics of the Romanian Academy, 3 National University of Arts, Bucharest, Romania, 4 Romanian Society of Applied Geophysics 

Chapter 2 GEOSCIENCE FOR EDUCATION 

2.1. INTEGRATING ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY IN EARTH SCIENCE EDUCATION PRACTICESVanciu-Rău Adina1, Drăgan Mihai2, Tătaru Dragoș1, Rău Dan1

1 National Institute for Research and Development for Earth Physics, Romania, 2 Plan Zero, Timisoara, Romania

2.2. EDUCATION THROUGH EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES RELATED TO PETROLEUM ENGINEERING AND GEOPHYSICSMilica Vukić1, Mila Đuričić2, Snežana Komatina2, Aleksandra Kolarski2, Đurica Surla2, Isidora Popov2

1AGES, Belgrade, Serbia, 2 Technical Faculty “Mihajlo Pupin”, University of Novi Sad, Zrenjanin, Serbia

2.3. CONTRIBUTIONS TO A PHOTO DATABASE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY – Maria Bostenaru Dan

“Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism, Romania

Chapter 3 GEOSCIENCE FOR ENVIRONMENT

3.1. THE GEOMAGNETIC DIPOLE EVOLUTION IN THE LAST 400 YEARS. SUB-CENTENNIAL OSCILLATIONSCrișan Demetrescu, Venera Dobrică
“Sabba S. Ștefănescu” Institute of Geodynamics, Romanian Academy

3.2. FRACTURE ANALYSIS OF ÇAYSIMAV SEGMENT AND ITS SURROUNDINGS USING REMOTE SENSING METHODS (WEST ANATOLIA)Aycan Günay1, Ayşe Çağlayan1,2, Reza Saber1, Veysel Işık1

1Ankara University, Department of Geological Engineering, Tectonics Research Group, Ankara, Turkey, 2Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, General Directorate of Spatial Planning, Department of Geological Survey, Ankara, Turkey

3.3. An assessment of the deformation field associated to the November 08, 2019 Turkmanchay earthquake (Mw 5.9) using INSAR and aftershock data (NW Iran)Reza Saber1, Veysel Işık1, Ayşe Çağlayan1,2

1 Ankara University, Department of Geological Engineering, Tectonics Research Group, Ankara, Turkey, 2 Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, General Directorate of Spatial Planning, Department of Geological Survey, Ankara, Turkey

3.4. IDENTIFICATION OF QUARRY BLASTS IN THE DEVA REGION (ROMANIA) USING SEISMO-ACOUSTIC ANALYSISRaluca Dinescu1,2, Daniela Ghica1, Mihaela Popa1,3

1 National Institute for Research and Development for Earth Physics, Romania, 2 University of Bucharest, Romania, 3 Academy of Romanian Scientists

3.5. GEOPHYSICS AS A TOOL IN RISK ASSESSMENT DURING ROAD CONSTRUCTION: A CASE STUDY IN A COMPLEX GEOLOGICAL REGIME IN WEST GREECE -Ilias Fikos1, George Vargemezis1, Panagiotis Tsourlos1

1 Department of Applied Geophysics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

3.6. GROUNDWATER CHEMICAL SIGNATURES – POSSIBLE CLUES FOR THE SEEMINGLY ERRATIC PRODUCTIVITY OF A GEOTHERMAL AQUIFER HOSTED BY A ~1 KM THICK CARBONATE SEQUENCE IN THE MOESIAN PLATFORM (ROMANIA)Horia Mitrofan1, Lucica Niculae1,4, Florina Chitea1,2,4, Constantin Marin3

1 “Sabba Ştefănescu” Institute of Geodynamics of the Romanian Academy, 2 University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, Bucharest Romania, 3 “Emil Racoviţă” Institute of Speleology, Bucharest Romania, 4 Romanian Society of Applied Geophysics

3.7. DATABASE AS A METHOD OF NATURAL HAZARD MONITORING AND RISK ANALYSISElena Petrova1

1 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

3.8. “GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE” AS AN IMPORTANT PART OF NATURAL RISK MANAGEMENTElena Petrova1

1 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

3.9.HOW GLOBAL WARMING HAS AFFECTED AGRICULTURE IN A TRANSYLVANIAN CITY. CASE STUDY: SIGHIȘOARADaria-Petruța Bratu1

1 PHD Student, Faculty of Geography, “Simion Mehedinți” Doctoral School, University of Bucharest, Romania

3.10. REMOTE SENSING AND IN-SITU DATA ANALYSIS FOR IDENTIFYING DYNAMIC PATTERNS IN MINING SITESAndrei-Ioan Vodă Marc1,2, Mihaela Gheorghe1,3, Alexandru Nedelea1, Iuliana Armaș1

1 Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, Romania, 2 C.N.A.I.R. S.A. – CESTRIN, Romania, 3 GMV Innovating Solutions, Bucharest, Romania 

3.11. DETERMINATION OF LAND SUBSIDENCE IN GORGAN PLAIN WITH INSAR METHOD (GOLESTAN, NE IRAN)Marjan Tourani1, Ayşe Çağlayan1,2, Reza Saber1, Veysel Işık1                                                                                                                            

1Ankara University, Department of Geological Engineering, Tectonics Research Group, Ankara, Turkey, 2Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, General Directorate of Spatial Planning, Department of Geological Survey, Ankara, Turkey

3.12. VLF SIGNALS AS THE REMOTE SENSING TOOL FOR GEOHAZARD MONITORINGAleksandra Kolarski 1, Snežana Komatina 2

1 Technical Faculty “Mihajlo Pupin”, University of Novi Sad, Zrenjanin, Serbia

3.13. APPLIED COMPARISON OF THE EROSION MODELS RUSLE-3D, SP AND USPED-Mara Ioana Nilca1, Iuliana Armaș1

1 University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography, Romania